Tom Whitwell knows a lot about headlines, since he’s Assistant Editor, online, for The Times. This are notes from his talk at Social Media Camp ’08.
- If you’re using Gmail, you should start thinking about SEO-ing your subjects, so you’ll actually find something in 10-years time.
- For first hundred years of newspapers, they were really rubbish at selling stories
- 1967: Headlines finally get clever
- Internet: suddenly headlines start to go different
- Times internet: lots of data points to figure out what works
- The clearest example of “good headlines†is the Drudge Report
- The difference of headlines is not 5% but 5x or even 20x
- What makes people click? It’s working out what the story is, what your reader will respond to, and how to squeeze all the goodness into 68 characters
Rules of thumb:
- Be specific
- The the whole story in the headline
- Don’t try to be clever
- Don’t try to be funny
- Play to your niche. Don’t over simplify or patronize in the headline
Quick wins:
- Lists = force you to do research and explain your points properly
- Quotes = Often the most interesting bit in the story
- Numbers = Often the most interesting bit in the story
- Names = Most likely who the story is about
- Don’t worry about “being boringâ€
- Write the headline first. Really. Always.
- Great story which you can’t explain in the headline = crap story
- Spend a lot of time on headline. Remember: 20x the traffic.
Questions:
- Do you do split tests? It’s quite tricky in practice, so only in limited amount.
- Do you seed your stories on Digg? Not really.
- How much traffic do you get from Digg? Big Digg – over 100k visits. Fark sends you about 30k.
- How much traffic you get from Drudge report? It will send you about 50k visits.
- Do you automatically promote stories? No, not yet. We look at it manually and go to news desk as we see stories get picked up.
- Is there a difference between headline that you want someone to read vs. to respond to? We’re focusing for the purpose for this talk on how to get people to click.
Well written. Thanks.
Seesmic video reply from Disqus.
I disagree about not being clever and funny – I think SEO is killing clever headlines.
Instead of writers dumbing down for search engines I think search engines should get smarter.
Well written. Thanks.
Seesmic video reply from Disqus.
I disagree about not being clever and funny – I think SEO is killing clever headlines.
Instead of writers dumbing down for search engines I think search engines should get smarter.